“>1. Shall be established a biennial award for the best original scientific research conducted in the field
“>The honorary president of the award is Prof. Domenico Inzitari. “>author’s statement that the date of submission of the same work is not yet “acce “>2.
“>Italy, the Sin (Italian Society of Neurology), Sno (Neurological Hospital), the Region “>and the Order of Physicians of the Province of Vibo Valentia
“>3. Prizes will be awarded three jobs, with prizes “>euro, respectively, to be allocated
“>This year, the two scientific societies “>Neurological most representative (SIN and SNO) “>distributed “>the burden of premiums
“>4. The competition is open to researchers in experimental and clinical sciences in the field of stroke “> in a clinical or research established in Italy. “>experimental design and conduct of research that has produced results “>such preferred securities.
brain. Must be research with scientific results and their originals. “>action
be paramount. “>articles, meta-analyzes or other items without
“>6. Entries must be sent in full (in Italian or English),
“>September 201 “>President of ‘Hipponion STROKE NATIONAL PRIZE, Dr. Domenico Consoli, Avenue of the
“>sent by post, the date of dispatch of postmark) backed by sections
“>surfaces: table of contents, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion,
words. “>, Under their own responsibility, the role he / she played in the research work. “>host / presenter, with regard to design, conduct of the study, analysis of results, year elements of privilege for the award. “>prepared an attached card that contains the data, the tax code, the professional role, the “>h and under its responsibility to “>7., The Commission will assess the scientific work sent anonymously each of three independent reviewers. “>tion will be:
“>Originality of the scientific question (innovative contribution compared to the previous knowledge of the
“>with the previous literature, score from 1 to 10.
“>Conclusions congruous with the results (degree of inference
“>generalizability of the results) pts “>to 10.
“>Overall assessment, taking into account the age of the investigator and the role he played in
“>In case of conflict between the two referees, the evaluation with
“>jointly by all the members of the advisory board.
“>directly by the candidate / in the premium, for the val
“>a report of 15 minutes (10 for presentation, 5 for discussion) to be held
“>9. Scientific work of the Committee will
“>10. The awards av
. “>P. Binelli,
C. Fieschi, G.F. “>L. Provincial
“>Quattrone, V. Toso